By Robert Reich, Robert Reich

What passes for business reporting in the United States is too often a series of breathless reports about the stock market. When the Dow rises precipitously, as it did today (Wednesday), the business press predicts an end to the Great Recession. When the stock market plummets, as it did last week, the Great Recession is said to be worsening.

Pay no attention. The stock market has as much to do with the real economy as the weather has to do with geology. Day by day there’s no relationship at all. Over time, weather and geology interact but the results aren’t evident for many years. The biggest impact of the weather is on peoples’ moods, as are the daily ups and downs of the market.

The real economy is jobs and paychecks, what people buy and what they sell. And the real economy — even viewed from a worldwide perspective — is as precarious as ever, perhaps more so.

Today’s rally was triggered by news that one of China’s official measures of its growth – its Purchasing Managers Index – rose. The index had been in decline for three straight months.

Why should an obscure measurement on the other side of the world cause stock markets in New York, London, and Frankfurt to rally? Because China is so large and its needs seemingly limitless that its growth has been about the only reliable source of global demand.

Many big American companies have been showing profits because they’re doing ever more business in China while cutting payrolls at home. American consumers aren’t buying much of anything because they’ve lost their jobs or are worried about losing them, and are still trying to get out from under a huge debt load (the latest figures show more consumer debt delinquent now than last year and a surge in personal bankruptcies). The U.S. housing market is growing worse, auto and retail sales are dropping, and the ranks of the jobless continue to swell.

Europe is in almost as much a mess. The problem there isn’t just or even mainly that Greece and other nations on the “periphery” have too much public debt. A bigger problem is European consumers aren’t buying nearly enough to generate more jobs. Unemployment remains high, and the trend is bad. Manufacturing growth there has slowed to its weakest pace in six months. Yet bizarrely, Europe’s large economies – Britain, Germany, and France – are paring back their public budgets. It’s exactly the wrong time, and a recipe for disaster.

Germany’s so-called “job miracle” (as Chancellor Angela Merkel calls it) is more mirage than miracle. Most of the gains in employment there have come from part-time jobs, often at low pay. Average annual net income per German employee continues to drop. This explains why domestic demand there is so sluggish and why Germany is desperately dependent on its exports of machinery and manufacturing components to Asia, especially China.

Meanwhile, Japan, now the world’s third-largest economy, is a basket case. Japanese consumers aren’t buying much of anything, and why would they? The country is still in the grip of a deflationary cycle that shows no end. Japanese consumers reason if they can buy it cheaper next week there’s no reason to buy now. Basically the only thing keeping Japan’s economy going are its exports of cars and electronic components to China.

Australia is booming, but look closely and you see the same buyer. Australia is making a boatload of money selling its minerals and raw materials to China (Australia is fast becoming one big Chinese mine shaft). The Brazilian economy is soaring. Why? Exports of wheat and cattle to China. Middle East oil producers are getting richer. Why? China’s insatiable thirst for oil.

Elsewhere around the globe the picture is as uncertain. Much of Pakistan is under water. Much of the rest of the Middle East is under tyrannical or corrupt regimes. Russia has suffered such a dry spell it’s hoarding wheat. Despite its wealthy few, India’s masses are still terribly poor.

The stock market could plunge tomorrow or the next day because the world’s economic fundamentals are so precarious.

The global economy cannot be sustained by one big, voracious nation – especially one that’s suffering bouts of civil unrest, actively repressing dissent, suffocating under a blanket of pollution and coping with other environmental hazards, and whose biggest companies are run by the state.

More articles from Robert Reich….

The Daily Reckoning

Labor Greens Unite!

Change climate with carbon price

Parasitic kids

Well that’s a good sign. Not twelve hours after we went to press with our latest newsletter – highlighting how September is historically the market’s worst month – and describing a Long Depression, stocks in New York rally by almost three percent. How is that good sign?

The Bear had everyone feeling pretty bearish about him. You can measure this in the number of put option buyers or in surveys. But this morning, we went to Google Trends to see how many people were searching for what you might describe as bearish topics like, say, economic collapse.

Click here to enlarge

You can see that thanks to the publication of two fairly high profile stories that went live late in August by Forbes and CNN, the conversation on collapse got a whole lot louder in the echo chamber that is the internet.

This more or less proves that if you wait on the mainstream press to validate your own thinking, you’ll always be late. It’s only safe for the papers to report on something once everyone’s thinking about it, and by then it’s too late to trade it.

But just to be safe, we asked our own in-house trading guru Murray Dawes what he thought. He wrote back that, “There is the possibility that the market has been ‘caught short’. By that I mean that traders could be overly bearish and short the market as a whole. The good GDP data could be squeezing them out of those positions and causing a short, sharp rally.”

“If this is the case,” he continued, “then you will see the market fall over again soon. If we see the ASX 200 close under the Point of Control of 4,400 in the next week or so then I would be confident that this current buying was a short squeeze and I would expect to see much lower prices in the near future. But until that occurs, this surprise rally should be respected.”

Murray’s article, by the way, was called, “Beware the false break out.” That term, “the false break out,” along with “the point of control” is key to his method of trading the markets. You can find out more by reading about Slipstream Trader.

Now we have to do something that’s required from time to time if you’re not familiar with our business model. We don’t like talking about our business model because you’d probably rather be reading about the stock market or the economy. So we’ll be quick about it!

The Daily Reckoning is free. So is the other e-letter which we publish, Money Morning. In them, you read independent and provocative ideas about the share market and the world that we hope are useful and maybe even profitable. A whole back office team supports getting these e-mails out to about 100,000 people combined each day.

The Daily Reckoning and Money Morning also contain the views of our independent analysts, Kris Sayce, Alex Cowie, Murray Dawes, and Greg Canavan. All of these analysts have chosen to work with us because, like you I suspect, they value a perspective that’s not compromised by any other agendas. They’re free to research and write about whatever they think will make you money, or keep you from losing it.

The newsletters which all of those analysts write cost money. The subscription fee supports the whole operation, including keeping the free e-letters free. To sell subscriptions, we include advertisements. Without the advertisements – which usually feature our latest and best ideas – we find it’s hard to sell subscriptions.

Of course not everybody likes advertising. Not everybody likes vegemite either. But nearly everyone likes free. Of course nothing is ever free. So the price of you receiving a free e-letter that you may occasionally find value from is that you’ll see advertisements for products to which you may already subscribe or to which you have no intention of ever subscribing.

We hope it’s not asking too much that even if you don’t like the ads and don’t want to subscribe, you recognise that we’re in a business and this is how we can provide the e-letters for free. And if you recently received a note from Alex talking about a resource stock that Kris was recommending and wondered why Alex didn’t’ recommend it, the simplest answer is that Alex is not Kris.

That is, Alex writes about resource stocks exclusively and does he research in his own way. It starts with a lot of spreadsheets and lately has included a lot mine site visits and phone conversations with geologists. Alex is well-versed in the resource sector and its nuances.

Kris is a small-cap specialist. There are a lot of small-cap stocks in Australia. There are also a lot of resource stocks in Australia. Many of the small-cap stocks are also resource stocks. Thus, Kris will, from time to time, recommend a small-cap stock that is also a resource stock.

We’ve found that some readers prefer Kris. Some prefer Alex. And some value what both are doing and realise that both are doing their own thing in their own way. If that troubles you…well…it shouldn’t. And if it realllly troubles you, we invite you to take up our offer and request a refund.

Finally, we see that the Greens and Labor have made a deal and that U.S. police have shot an armed man at the headquarters of the Discovery Channel in Maryland after he took people inside the building hostage. And we see that in some strange way, the events are not unrelated. Not causally, mind you, but philosophically.

Part of the big agreement yesterday announced by Labor and Green honchos was the set-up of a multi-party parliamentary committee to put a price on carbon. You can read about it here. But when you read about it, it’s clear that it’s a pretty undemocratic way of pretending to have a debate without having a debate. Typical, but pretty cynical. And as ever with the political class, it defers to the exalted power of “experts.”

Green’s Senator Christine Milne says that this very European process will, “Set up a parliamentary committee representing all the interests in the parliament committed to a certain idea and then enabling the appointment of experts to that committee. So the experts are not just to give evidence to the committee. The experts are part of the deliberations of that committee and that way you create the space in a parliament for people to talk through their own perspectives, nuance those perspectives and try to come up with a parliamentary consensus which has the support of everyone around the idea. “

Emphasis added is our own. But really, how much nuance can you have when everyone on the committee can only be on the committee if they are already committed to a certain idea? How hard is it to build consensus when you exclude everyone who might disagree from participating?

Milne continued: “You will note in the agreement the proviso for membership of the committee is that the people going onto it are committed to a carbon price. They may not all agree with the mechanism of achieving a carbon price but they all want to a carbon price and the idea is to invite everyone to it and the Coalition clearly if they were in opposition would be invited to join it on that proviso. So, it really is about grown up politics in Australia. It’s about ending the all or nothing, it’s about ending the accusations of back flips and sell outs and back downs and so on.”

In order to end the all or nothing false choice, it was necessary to create an all or nothing committee. Everyone who’s on it has to be all for a carbon price. No one who’s against a carbon price can be on it. That really is an effective way to end the argument. By not having it all and excluding other points of view.

Of course the justification for this is that the people against a carbon price are really whack jobs who don’t believe in global warming OR climate change. What’s more, they aren’t even experts. They’re just people, people who believe that common sense is more valuable than credentials. They’re just people. Very little people.

Milne says, “It’s a process we adopted in Tasmania to a very small degree when we achieved gay law reform by bringing in experts from the university, the justice department and so on to work with the parliamentarians. This I think can resolve this issue of a carbon price. It’s very important to us. We want one as soon as possible and we think this mechanism is the best way of delivering it.”

In other words, the best mechanism of delivering an outcome that the public hasn’t clearly endorsed is to use a non-democratic process that only includes people committed to the desired outcome. And that’s democratic how?

Honestly, we have to give credit where credit was due on this one. Julia Gillard had it right. Get a phone book from each city of 10,000 people or more in Australia. Pick ten people at random from each phone book. Put them on a Climate Change Committee. Put them in a three-star hotel outside the airport in Adelaide and give them six days to debate the issue and, if they decide, come up with a law.

What could be more democratic than that? If a random jury of your peers is good enough to deliver equal justice under law in the criminal justice system – where judges and juries must deal with complex evidence and experts – why is it not good enough to for public policy too?

In fact, the more we think about it, legislative conscription may be the best way to run the country after all. Each term, a new randomly selected group of conscripts is drafted to serve in Canberra. They are paid the minimum wage. You can be sure Parliament wouldn’t sit for long and that the government would generally stay out of most people’s lives and wallets, affording Australians the time and money to be good parents and neighbours.

Let’s have a vote! All in favour? All opposed?

But wait, what does this have to do with eco-terrorist James Lee’s bizarre actions and manifesto earlier today? Well, in point one of Lee’s manifesto, he seems to endorse Senator Milne’s committee of experts idea. We’ve reproduced the whole point here so we’re not selectively quoting, although the emphasis added is ours and not Lee’s:

The Discovery Channel and its affiliate channels MUST have daily television programs at prime time slots based on Daniel Quinn’s “My Ishmael” pages 207-212 where solutions to save the planet would be done in the same way as the Industrial Revolution was done, by people building on each other’s inventive ideas. Focus must be given on how people can live WITHOUT giving birth to more filthy human children since those new additions continue pollution and are pollution. A game show format contest would be in order. Perhaps also forums of leading scientists who understand and agree with the Malthus-Darwin science and the problem of human overpopulation. Do both. Do all until something WORKS and the natural world starts improving and human civilisation building STOPS and is reversed! MAKE IT INTERESTING SO PEOPLE WATCH AND APPLY SOLUTIONS!!!!

If poor Mr. Lee had just decided to run for office in Australia, he could be earning a public wage now instead of cooling in a morgue somewhere. He certainly has the right instincts to be in politics. He believes in coercion. He believes in State control of the media. He thinks “top down” solutions imposed from above should trump individual choices. He believes in expert scientists of a certain point of view. He’s against human civilisation and believes that children are filthy pollution.

Point four of his manifesto gets to the heart of his pro-planet, anti-human life message. He writes that, “Civilisation must be exposed for the filth it is. That, and all its disgusting religious-cultural roots and greed. Broadcast this message until the population of the planet is reversed and the human population goes down! This is your obligation. If you think it isn’t, then get the hell off the planet! Breathe Oil! It is the moral obligation of everyone living otherwise what good are they??”

Gee. That’s pretty much straight out of the tyrant’s modern political play book, isn’t it? Civilisation is filth? Check! Religion and culture and tradition are disgusting? Check! Human population should go down because it’s a pestilence? Check! Your obliged to agree? Check! If you disagree, go to hell? Check! If you disagree, you’re immoral? Check!

You get the feeling that some people just don’t like humanity. You get the feeling that some people view human life as a problem to be solved. That solution is vague, but usually involves somebody else dying without being killed. You get the feeling that deep down, some people view human beings as parasites on the planet. You get the feeling some people don’t feel very good about themselves but would like to take it out on the rest of us.

We also get the feeling that some people don’t view human life as the Ultimate Resource, as economist Julian Simon put it. Our view is that these people are themselves very selfish. They can’t imagine the world they live in coping with all the problems they perceive. So they want to destroy the world as it is and remake it into the world they want to live in, even if that world doesn’t include you and me.

It’s all very self-centred, moralistic, and unimaginative. And of course, Lee was plain crazy. He wrote, as this paragraph proves:

The world needs TV shows that DEVELOP solutions to the problems that humans are causing, not stupefy the people into destroying the world. Not encouraging them to breed more environmentally harmful humans. Saving the environment and the remaining species diversity of the planet is now your mindset. Nothing is more important than saving them. The Lions, Tigers, Giraffes, Elephants, Froggies, Turtles, Apes, Raccoons, Beetles, Ants, Sharks, Bears, and, of course, the Squirrels.

Of course the Squirrels!

TV will save us!

Save the froggies.

It would all be absurd and sad if there weren’t real live crazy people trying to run the government who didn’t’ share more or less the same anti-human, anti-civilisation worldview.

Dan Denning
for The Daily Reckoning Australia

Similar Posts:

• If Market Keeps this Way, There May Be More Beaten Down Stocks
• Why is 5,000 a Key Psychological Level?
• Algoholics Anonymous
• Small Caps to Lead the Way in 2009
• Biased Lenders

More articles from The Daily Reckoning….

Zero Hedge

Seeing Past The Hologram, by Mike Krieger of KAM LP

There is no distinctly American criminal class – except Congress.

- All quotes by Mark Twain

We Need Real Confidence to Return, Not Confidence in a Ponzi Scheme

Last week I pointed out that what I got from Banana Ben’s speech in Jackson Hole was that he realized any major public statement of interference in markets was too risky at this point following his announcement at the last meeting to keep the balance sheet steady by reinvesting MBS proceeds into treasury securities.  The operative word in this sentence being “public.”  Anyone that believes this means the Fed and government will just take a back seat and do nothing behind the scenes is deluding themselves.  Washington D.C. and the Fed still fail to comprehend how to increase standards of living in the real world, rather they remain completely addicted to the short-term buzz of printed money heroin as it flows through the house of cards they have created.  They also think that the only thing that really matters in an economy is “confidence.”  As Madoff can attest to, that is indeed the case when you are running a ponzi scheme and since the U.S. government is basically that I can understand where they are coming from.

 I agree that confidence is a huge part of any healthy economy; however, I do not define confidence in the way these arrogant bureaucrats do.  They think confidence comes from rising asset prices, including stocks and homes.  They think this is enough to spark growth in the real economy.  This is nonsense.  The confidence that is needed more than anything else today is two-fold.  First, confidence that there is the rule of law and there will be the rule of law in the future.  The second is that the money issued by the government will maintain its purchasing power over time.  As I have made clear on various occasions, I do not have confidence in either of these things based on how the government has responded to the crisis.  I do not like buying physical gold.  I do not like feeling the need to write these emails every week to warn people.  I wish I could employ capital into businesses and the real economy.  I hope that one day I will be able to do so, but at the moment I do not trust my government and I certainly don’t trust the fascist Federal Reserve.  So I will hoard what I have as the government prints and let the storm pass me by.  I am not the only one.  People are collectively starting to understand this.  So what happens when the big, smart money takes itself out of the investment and capital allocation game because they don’t trust anything?  What happens when the government’s response to this is to print money to keep up the spending habits of people with no jobs or people with government jobs that produce no goods for the economy?  You get the worst case scenario and that is exactly what is staring us straight in the face.

Is a Trade War with China Coming?

The quicker the dollar is devalued the better.  This is not to say that I think dollar devaluation is a good thing.  It is to say we are past the point of avoiding it.  We could have taken the pain in 2008, but instead it was extend and pretend all over again.  Now the debt and promises are too big.  The behind the scenes manipulations are too entrenched.  There is no avoiding a devaluation relative to things people need (food and energy) and capital goods that are imported.  The best thing would be to get it over with and then change policies and restore the rule of law.  The problem with this is that the main currencies the dollar needs its major adjustment against are those in emerging Asia and China.  What has prevented the realignment from happening in a quick and healthy way is China’s refusal to allow the yuan to appreciate.  This creates a situation where Central Banks throughout emerging Asia take steps to prevent their “free-floating” currencies from adjusting either.  If China does not change its policy I fear that what we are looking at a trade war with China after the November elections.  I think Congress and the Administration will start to introduce aggressive policies to discourage Chinese goods and encourage goods made at home.  Think it can’t happen?  We are a lot closer than you think.  This all goes back to my “think local” theme.  While I am inherently a fan of free trade we do not have free trade in any sense whatsoever.  We have policies that are geared to advantage the multi-national corporations at the expense of the U.S. citizen.  The U.S. consumer has merely been spending borrowed money.  This gave an illusion that the U.S. was benefiting from the global multinational corporate rigged market whose model mainly thrives on companies moving abroad to exploit the labor arbitrage caused by a combination of what was a labor surplus (no longer it seems) and a rigged currency.  As more people realize this, more pressure will be placed on politicians and ultimately this will overpower the corporate lobbyists and a trade war of sorts will begin.  Then the chaos could really ensue as we engage in a trade war with our biggest creditor!

Seeing Past the Hologram

The past couple of weeks have been extraordinarily interesting and some of the moves appear to be extremely important.  Although a lot of people like to point to the treasury market and then extrapolate out as to what this means to equities and the ability of the government to increase spending, I think this is the most USELESS market in the world to watch.  If anything is a hologram and a PR tool it is the U.S. treasury market.  How can people with a straight face come out and extrapolate anything from a market where the Federal Reserve is buying the debt of its own government!  The Fed is merely the fiat drug dealer to a government addicted to spending and false promises.  The equity market is the second most useless market in my opinion.  There is no doubt in my mind that a huge part of the government’s “strategy” to build confidence is to keep this thing from doing what it should be doing.  Thus, I am not surprised at all that since I last wrote the S&P500 was +1.6%, -1.5%, flat, and then +3.0%.  So what you have seen is high volatility with no real direction.  How can anyone have confidence this that thing is for real?

So what markets do I watch?  I get the most from the FX markets and the commodity markets.  While these markets are no doubt manipulated heavily as well, I think this is where the players that really understand the macro are playing.  The first currency I check in the morning is the dollar/yen.  The reason for this is that the yen is back to the highs of 1995 and if it does not stop appreciating around this level I think the Bank of Japan is going to absolutely panic.  While the yen has not broken higher yet as market participants are afraid of such intervention, unless the BOJ does something extreme soon the market may test their resolve and push this thing further.  I guess the main point I am trying to make is that with the Chinese yuan NOT strengthening and the yen threatening to break out we could be in for some major fireworks.  Meanwhile Japanese 10 year government bond yields have really started to spike lately (chart GJG10 Index on Bloomberg).  Something big is happening in the land of the rising sun.  In the back of my head I think that any panic move from the BOJ could be the spark that breaks government bond bubbles globally and ushers in a period of massive global commodity driven inflation as every country tries to devalue their way to prosperity.  Essentially, a fiat money version of the 1930’s beggar thy neighbor policies.  When this begins the rush into gold and silver that we have seen thus far will look like a trickle.  I don’t think people will be able to find supply anywhere near the quoted price on comex (or as some like to call it “crimex”).

This brings me to silver which potentially experienced a game changer last week.  I can’t remember the last time silver bounced back almost immediately after every attempted raid.  I am starting to wonder how much physical silver is available.  What we do know is that Central Banks do not store silver to manipulate markets.  Even if it doesn’t break out right now, there is no asset in the world that has more upside than silver.  Don’t buy SLV either.  Buy physical silver not something with JPM as a custodian. 

I also continue to watch food prices very closely.  Wheat, which has come off of its high now seems to have found a base at a price that is 50% higher than the end of June.  Corn prices are threatening to break above resistance at levels 30% where they were at the end of June.  Rice looks like it could have a long way to go on the upside as it is only 20% off of its June low.  If I were a foreign government I would be using this opportunity to buy every single grain of rice I could in order to feed my people when things get dicey in the months ahead.  After strong performance in recent months lean hogs and live cattle also look set to make another push to the upside.  How people in the investment world still focus on the government inflation statistics is beyond me.  It was the rampant commodity inflation, trucker strikes and food riots that played a key role in ending the game in 2008.  This is because it forced the emerging markets to raise rates and cool growth as the Western world imploded under a pile of debt.  It seems the whole play is starting again and people remain focused on deflation.  Deflation in some things yes I agree (discretionary things like homes, technology, stock prices, etc), but not in the things you NEED to buy!!!

Onto oil which is also exhibiting some strange moves.  The Asian benchmark Tapis has not experienced the recent volatility and weakness that WTI has and is currently trading at $80/b.  The Asian price is the one I really pay attention to since that is where the demand growth resides.  The spread between the two now is back above $6/b, which is toward the high end of the range for the past two years.  This tells me that one price is wrong and the spread should narrow.  Given what I think about currency debasement and lack of appropriate investment in the space I think WTI should rally.  We shall see…

A Primer on the Federal Reserve

For those that read my commentary on the Federal Reserve as an immoral an fascist institution and think to themselves “what is this guy talking about,” I have attached a video from G Edward Griffith (the author of The Creature from Jekyll Island).  It’s a great description of how the Fed was formed and who it answers to when push comes to shove.  http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6507136891691870450#

Also in case you weren’t aware of the power grab that the “Financial Reform” legislation allowed the Fed, read this Bloomberg article. 

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2010-09-02/bernanke-meets-buffett-in-new-role-conceived-to-protect-markets.html

All the best,
Mike

More articles from Zero Hedge….

Zero Hedge

We continue with our series of artist renderings of various infamous desktops (previously Barack Obama, Ben Bernanke, Tim Geithner, and Lloyd Blankfein). Today, we focus on that of administration straight shooter Rahm Emanuel.

h/t Mike

More articles from Zero Hedge….

Oil Price Ignores Long-Term Supply Worries

You could be excused for seeing a grim metaphor for the death of the oil age in the scenes of destruction visited on the U.S. Gulf coast this summer.

However, production from the ocean floor is growing more quickly than from any other type of reserve and is supposed to allay concerns about ‘peak oil’, the idea that the amount of crude the world can produce might suddenly decline.

Now, so far, this notion hasn’t had much of an impact on energy prices.

But, as cheaper oil fields are run down and more crude is drawn from expensive, hard-to-reach offshore reserves, the costs of energy supply are starting to rise.

Drilling agency imposes conflict-of-interest rules

WASHINGTON – Scandalized by federal regulators who had sex with oil company executives and negotiated with them for jobs, the agency that oversees offshore drilling is imposing a first-ever ethics policy that bars inspectors from dealing with a company that employs a family member or personal friend.

Michael Bromwich, head of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, said the new policy should help restore credibility to his beleaguered agency, which was widely criticized under its former name — the Minerals Management Service — for being too close with oil and gas companies.

President Barack Obama and Interior Secretary Ken Salazar have pledged to end the agency’s “cozy relationship” with industry and slow the revolving door between government and the energy industry.

Pemex looks to shale

Pemex is considering opening an entire line of exploration that concentrates on shale gas wells in the northern state of Coahuila.

Pemex board member Hector Moreira told Market News International the new line could reduce the company’s dependence on natural gas imports.

OPEC oil output falls to lowest since Nov 2009

LONDON (Reuters) – OPEC crude oil supply fell in August to the lowest since November 2009 as reduced supplies from Nigeria, the United Arab Emirates and Iraq offset increased output in Angola, a Reuters survey showed on Wednesday.

Supply from the 11 members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries with output targets, all except Iraq, averaged 26.83 million barrels per day (bpd) last month, down from 26.95 million bpd in July, according to the survey of oil companies, OPEC officials and analysts.

The Gas Bulls of Summer Turn into Bears

Recently, the last of the raging bulls on natural gas prices traded in their horns for bear uniforms – and we don’t mean the Monsters of the Midway variety! By throwing in the towel on gas prices for this year, these bulls-turned-bears then proceeded to claw their future gas price forecast by stating they expected $6 per thousand cubic feet (Mcf) to be the long-term average. The reality is that these bulls of summer were really merely acknowledging the power of the market as natural gas prices are about two dollars per Mcf below where they were at the start of 2010, and well below the $7.50/Mcf average gas price the bulls had forecast.

Feds downplay risk of leak when well cap moved

The federal government’s point man on the Gulf of Mexico spill response said Wednesday there is no “significant risk” that more oil will leak into the sea when engineers remove the temporary cap Thursday that first contained the gusher in mid-July.

Retired Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen said vessels will remain on standby just in case to collect any leaking oil.

FACTBOX – Key political risks to watch in Uganda

(Reuters) – Uganda expects to become an oil-producing nation in 2011, but a protracted dispute with British exploration firm Heritage Oil may delay production and risks unsettling other investors.

With the potential to be a top 50 oil producer, Uganda stands to reduce its budget dependence on foreign aid and improve poor infrastructure.

Nissan starts selling all-electric Leaf sedan today

At long last, Nissan begins taking actual orders today for the first next-generation fully electric car from a major automaker, the Leaf.

Carpooling

Passengers might be the most under-appreciated factor in how much fuel and money you waste. As I write this, for example, a business headline boasts of Toyota’s multi-million-dollar plan to boost fuel efficiency by 25 percent, with the usual discussion of what this will mean for the economy and the climate. Any of us, however, can boost the efficiency of our cars by several hundred percent instantly, with no additional expense or technology, simply by getting more people in the car.

This fact is also forgotten when we judge car owners by the wastefulness of their vehicles. An SUV is a spectacularly inefficient machine compared to a Prius, for example, but pack that Dodge Durango full of people and suddenly it is greener than the electric hybrid driven alone.

Transit systems easier to predict with smart phone apps

Allen Stern says he had a 40-minute wait between buses when he lived in Manhattan. Using a free mobile app that became available about a year ago, he could at least tap into the Metropolitan Transit Authority with his cellphone and find out exactly how far away the next bus was from his stop.

Jatropha: A new form of energy

SINGAPORE – Biotechnology firm JOil is confident that it can breed and genetically engineer the Jatropha plant to be a more sustainable alternative to fossil fuel and other biofuels.

It plans to create a Jatropha hybrid that can produce more fruits and match the four to six tonnes of oil per hectare that palm trees can generate.

Pedal power takes off as exercise produces electricity

Pedal power is gaining traction as thousands of bikes and elliptical machines are retrofitted to produce electricity.

Gyms are using sweat equity to help power their facilities. A Brooklyn eatery uses it to make smoothies. Female inmates at a Phoenix jail pedal to power their TV to watch soap operas. Actor Ed Begley Jr. bikesrides a bike to run his toaster.

Obama lobbied to add solar panels to White House

A campaign to make the White House greener is intensifying as a group of environmentalists plan this month to give President Obama a solar panel that used to sit atop 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

Points of departure

There is a strong correlation between energy consumption and economic growth. We can for sure hope for “decoupling” – to be able to have continued economic growth while maintaining or even reducing energy use – but no country has ever managed this Indian rope trick and that does not bode well. Maybe we are high on energy, listening a little to closely to the voice of intoxication, but it will unfortunately all too soon be replaced by a massive hangover.

The Peak Oil Crisis: Prospects for China

The key question in all this is how much longer China’s economic miracle can continue before the realities of finite mineral resources force a slowdown? Another five years of 10 percent annual economic growth will result in Beijing increasing its oil consumption by another 2.5-3 million barrels per day. This alone would likely mop up much of the world’s spare capacity to produce oil and result in very large price increases. When China’s ever growing demand is added to that of India, Brazil and the oil exporting states, the likelihood that we will see a substantial increase in oil prices within the next five years becomes very high.

Secret German military study warns of dramatic oil crisis

Berlin : A confidential German army study warned of a looming oil crisis which could have dramatic political and economic consequences for the world, the Hamburg-based weekly news magazine Der Spiegel said Tuesday.

According to the report, a think-tank of the German army has for the first time ever analyzed the security policy dimensions of the peak oil problem.

Peak Oil from a Security Studies Perspective

The Strategic Institute of the German Bundeswehr has now published a document on the implications of peak oil for security (more precisely: the study was leaked). The study is very well written and recommended as an essential read not only for geostrategist but especially for those involved in global sustainability questions. In fact, at least in wording the authors care about such diverse issues as environmental impact of unconventional oils and the impact of global-marked-induced land-use change on indigenous populations. It is worthwhile to have a closer look on some of their results:

Remembering Matt Simmons

Matt Simmons, a long time friend of the Maine coast and its islands and a student of the winds and waters of Gulf of Maine, loved to tell the story of his first trip to Maine, courtesy of a labor strike while he worked construction one summer as a college student in his home state of Utah. When a labor dispute suddenly shut down the construction site, he and a buddy were only too happy to collect their strike checks and head out on a jaunt. They went north into the Canadian Rockies then turned right and headed toward the Inscrutable East, dipping back down into the United States via the border at Jackman, where they drove along the shores of Moosehead Lake before ending up in Boston. On a lark, Matt ducked into the Harvard Business School, which had not had a long history at that point of actively recruiting students from Mormon country in Utah, but the visit was enough to entice him to apply and enroll. Matt loved telling that story because it held the kinds of mutually opposed contradictions he loved to explore-a businessman who owed his right future to a labor strike. If genius is the ability to hold mutually opposing ideas in the mind at the same time without being paralyzed, Matt Simmons would certainly qualify.

Oil Drops, Caps Worst Month Since May, as Hurricane Earl Threatens Demand

Oil tumbled, capping its worst month since May, on forecasts Hurricane Earl will pelt the U.S. East Coast, curbing fuel demand during the Labor Day holiday weekend.

Crude dropped the most in 12 weeks amid speculation that stormy weather will keep beachgoers and travelers at home. Labor Day is the traditional end of the U.S. summer driving season, the peak gasoline demand period. U.S. gasoline demand slid to a 12-week low last week, MasterCard Inc. reported today.

“It’s the last thing we need,” said John Kilduff, a partner at Again Capital LLC, a New York-based hedge fund that focuses on energy. “It’s a big gasoline consumption weekend. Given how poor the gasoline demand has been, it will be a final parting blow for the summer driving season if people won’t hit the beach in droves.”

Ethanol Surpasses Gasoline for First Time Since December

For the first time since December, ethanol prices are higher than gasoline as corn surges and refiners profit from tax breaks.

Gas Prices Explained

So what determines the price of gasoline? Speculators? Evil conspiring oil companies? Well, actually no. It’s demand and supply, of course. On the demand side the American automobile fleet gets better gas mileage than it did a few years ago and Americans, whacked by the recession and high unemployment rates, are driving a bit less than they used to. In addition, thanks to government subsidies, about 9 percent of what goes into our gas tanks is ethanol produced from corn, which also reduces the demand for refined crude. On the supply side, global oil supplies are ample and refiners in the U.S. evidently believed the Obama administration’s rosy “recovery summer” scenarios and stockpiled a lot of gasoline.

Sinopec Plans to Cut September Oil Processing by 4% at Refinery in Hainan

China Petroleum & Chemical Corp., Asia’s biggest refiner, will process 4 percent less crude oil at its Hainan plant in September compared with last month, an official at the refinery said.

FACTBOX-Key political risks to watch in Saudi Arabia

(Reuters) – Saudi Arabia, under the rule of an ageing King Abdullah, has the dilemma of making reforms that keep the austere clerical establishment that opposes change on side and violent Islamist militants at bay.

Any instability at the helm of Saudi Arabia, which controls more than a fifth of the world’s crude oil reserves and is a regional linchpin of U.S. policy in the Middle East, would be a concern for the rest of the Arab Gulf region.

FACTBOX-Key political risks to watch in Yemen

(Reuters) – Rising al Qaeda militancy, a surge in violence in a secessionist south and crushing poverty will be this year’s critical tests for Yemen, neighbour to top oil exporter Saudi Arabia.

Reid hopeful for GOP energy votes after elections

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said he hoped to pick up Republican votes for a pared-down energy bill after the midterm congressional elections.

“Maybe after the elections we can get some more Republicans to help us on these issues,” Reid, a Democrat, told reporters in a teleconference on Tuesday.

Sinopec Sees Solid Gas Growth Ahead

While oil production experienced sluggishness in the first half, natural gas production showed solid growth. China is ramping up gas production as it seeks to find alternatives to coal, which emits high carbon levels. It is set to raise the country’s energy needs from the current 3% to 10% by 2020.

Insurance likely to reduce BP’s liability for Gulf of Mexico oil spill

BP PLC has taken on some of the blame for the Deepwater Horizon rig that spilled millions of gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico earlier this year, but the company is still expected to have limited liability for mistakes made misreading pressure data that indicated a blowout was imminent.

BP Raises $363 Million in Malaysian Asset Sale to Help Pay for Gulf Spill

BP Plc, seeking cash to help pay for the worst U.S. oil spill, agreed to sell its Malaysian chemical assets to Petroliam Nasional Bhd. to focus on projects in China and India.

BP will sell its 15 percent stake in Ethylene Malaysia Sdn and 60 percent interest in Polyethylene Malaysia Sdn for $363 million, the London-based company said today in a statement. It will also be eligible for a possible $48 million dividend from the ethylene unit.

A Nuclear Giant Moves Into Wind

Exelon, a nuclear giant that recently backed away from building new nuclear plants, is moving into wind.

Canada company builds major waste-to-biofuel plant

VANCOUVER, British Columbia (Reuters) – A Canadian company started construction on Tuesday on what it says is the world’s first industrial-scale plant to turn municipal waste into biofuel.

Privately-owned Enerkem Inc said the C$80 million ($75 million) facility in Edmonton, Alberta, will produce enough biofuel to keep more than 400,000 cars a year running on a 5 percent ethanol fuel blend.

Thorium Cures the Free Market

Obama could kill fossil fuels overnight with a nuclear dash for thorium … If Barack Obama were to marshal America’s vast scientific and strategic resources behind a new Manhattan Project, he might reasonably hope to reinvent the global energy landscape and sketch an end to our dependence on fossil fuels within three to five years.

New Warnings About Costs of Nuclear Power

As anticipation grows about a possible renaissance for the nuclear power industry — and about its potential for curbing greenhouse gas emissions — some politicians are stepping up warnings about the high cost of such projects.

Last week, Traicho Traikov, the Bulgarian economy and energy minister, said the cost of building a second plant near the Danube River had reached 9 billion euros, or $11.4 billion, according to the Sofia News Agency.

The original cost of the project for two reactors was expected to be just under $4 billion.

Homeowners Must Pay Off Energy Improvement Loans

Many homeowners who participated in a program that let them repay the cost of solar panels and other energy improvements through an annual surcharge on their property taxes must pay off the loans before they can refinance their mortgages, two government-chartered mortgage companies said Tuesday.

The guidance came from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as efforts to resolve a dispute over the program — called Property Assessed Clean Energy, or PACE — have failed.

Calif. rejects ban on plastic shopping bags

SACRAMENTO, Calif. – California lawmakers have rejected a bill seeking to ban plastic shopping bags after a contentious debate over whether the state was going too far in trying to regulate personal choice.

The Democratic bill, which failed late Tuesday, would have been the first statewide ban, although a few California cities already prohibit their use.

A Greener Champagne Bottle

“This is how we’re remaking the future of Champagne,” he said, pointing to the area just below the neck. “We’re slimming the shoulders to make the bottle lighter, so our carbon footprint will be reduced to help keep Champagne here for future generations.”

The Champagne industry has embarked on a drive to cut the 200,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide it emits every year transporting billions of tiny bubbles around the world. Producing and shipping accounts for nearly a third of Champagne’s carbon emissions, with the hefty bottle the biggest offender.

Cleaner Cars, A to D

The Obama administration has proposed new stickers for cars and light trucks that will make it easier to see whether you are buying a fuel-efficient one or a guzzler, and how much it contributes to global warming. The stickers are a symbol of how far this country has come in providing a wider range of environmentally responsible choices to help ensure cleaner air and a healthier planet.

L.A. mayor, Latino activists take on oil companies over Proposition 23

They say the ballot initiative to suspend the state’s climate change law would hurt low-income communities already suffering the most from pollution.

Jeff Rubin: High energy prices make Copenhagen green

There is certainly much to be said for Denmark’s leadership in green energy. While North American carbon emissions have risen by around 30 per cent since 1990 (the reference point for the Kyoto Accord), Denmark’s emissions are actually lower than they were two decades ago. That’s generally ascribed to the fact that a world-leading 20 per cent of the power generated in Denmark comes from wind.

Less commonly known is the source of the other 80 per cent. I was surprised to discover that it comes from good old King Coal. In fact, coal’s share of power generation in Denmark’s power grid is basically the same as it is in China.

Tiny creatures reveal ancient sea levels

“It was a very big surprise,” says David Barnes, lead author of the study at the British Antarctic Survey, of the find of similar bryozoans 2400 kilometres apart in seas on either side of the West Antarctic ice sheet, which is 2 kilometres thick.

“The most likely explanation of such similarity is that this ice sheet is much less stable than previously thought and has collapsed at some point in the recent past,” he says.

“And if the West Antarctic ice shelf has been lost in recent times we have to re-think the possibility of loss in future with climate change.”

The CoStar Commercial Repeat-Sale Indices (CCRSI), produced by CoStar Group, found that investment-grade property continued to decline in value for the second straight month in July. Properties of sufficient quality and size for inclusion in large…

Read more….

By Karl Denninger, The Market Ticker

The next two days could prove to be very interesting – but probably won’t.

Dick Fuld is prepared to later assert:

Lehmans demise was caused by uncontrollable market forces and the incorrect perception and accompanying rumors that Lehman did not have sufficient capital to support its investments.

Uh huh.  It wasn’t caused by 30:1 leverage Dick?  You know, leverage you got "enabled" to use by Pauslon?  Of course you weren’t forced to use that, but heh, if the music is playing, you had to get up and dance, right?

In 2007, when the U.S. housing market began to show signs of weakening, Lehman Brothers and many of its competitors had already accumulated large positions in what were considered less liquid assets. Many market observers, including government officials charged with oversight of the financial markets, believed that the problems in the subprime residential mortgage market were and would be contained.

You were wrong.  But a prudent CEO, and a prudent company, doesn’t "bet the firm" on a premise that their largest-concentration of assets in what is clearly a bubble economic environment, unsupported by the macro level fundamentals, will not only go on forever but will see it’s equivalent of multiple expansion continue forever. That by definition – the belief in expansion of a compound-growth function at ever-increasing rates – is a Ponzi Scheme.

Ponzi schemes are broadly illegal.  While it’s not illegal to place bets on asset appreciation, when you claim to be in a position of "systemic risk" you should be held to a higher standard.  That standard was not only loosened it was destroyed in the years from 2003-2007.  Bear Stearns was a final warning that the Ponzi had collapsed, yet Lehman refused to heed that warning, instead choosing to rely on the premise that a government tit would be proffered to suckle from.  When it was not the firm collapsed.

Then there’s Wachovia.  I read through Scott Alvarez’s testimony (FRB’s Counsel) which goes through the usual mantra of how Wachovia’s business deteriorated due to macro-level economic developments not under it’s control, along with the seizure of WaMu. 

Notably missing from this analysis, along with Steele’s, Wachovia’s former CEO, is any mention of the fact that Wachovia was writing credit-default swaps (CDS) on their own deals in the Option ARM space and bundling them with the lower-rated tranches as a means of being able to sell them!

This is important for two reasons: It is roughly equivalent to you writing fire insurance on your own house, when the entirety of your net worth including all your liquid cash is contained within the house in a shoebox.  Should the house burn you will of course be unable to pay off on your self-dealt "insurance."  Second, there is no mention as to where those instruments are now or what they’re actually worth.  We know where they are – they’re off-balance sheet at Wells, which now has roughly one trillion dollars of off-balance sheet exposure – with no way to evaluate the "wisdom" (or lack thereof) on the marks on those "assets."

It is that fact, incidentally, that led myself and many others, including hedge fund managers, to short the stock.  That in turn drove the CDS spreads out.  But the predicate act that led people like myself to reach this conclusion – that the bank was hiding losses and likely was insolvent – was an act taken by their own hand and enabled by willfully-blind regulators.

Indeed, the bottom line problem here with Wachovia is the same as it has been up and down the line since this mess began – ridiculously over-optimistic asset "values".  This has not abated, as we keep seeing every week with FDIC bank seizures, where banks that are allegedly solvent (by their accounting of "assets" and "liabilities") are nonetheless seized and huge losses, often as much as 30% of the asset base, are absorbed.  This isn’t possible unless the "asset values" are pure works of FICTION.

After the 1929 crash the Pecora Commission was formed to find the causes and prevent it from happening again.  What Pecora found was that too much leverage combined with self-dealing and lies about asset valuations led to the collapse of banks and other members of the financial system when the falsehood of those asset "value" claims was exposed to the light of day, and that self-dealing in various forms led to covering up these deficiencies until they reached critical levels (where banks were literally unable to pay the light bill), by which point the entirety of the depositors’ funds were often gone.  Just as today, banks often maintained that they were "fine" right up until the fact that their assets were worth pennies was exposed.

Glass-Steagall was an attempt to prevent that from happening again by separating deposit-holding banks from securities activities.  Between that and strict leverage limits, along with bank examiners, it was believed that loss-hiding would no longer be possible to a degree where these sorts of panics could develop.

For 40 years it worked.

Then we had the S&Ls, which gamed the system.  Bluntly, they broke the law, "trading" assets between themselves with a wink and a nod, thereby "establishing" asset valuations that were false.  This "supported" their lending and other activities – right up until, just as with the 1920s (and now) it led to their destruction when the truth began to leak out. 

But unlike today Bill Black came in with a mandate and started referring cases to prosecutors, who promptly sent over 1,000 people to prison for their lies and scams.

The FCIC will fail to be effective unless we have another Bill Black.  We must reverse those decisions of Congress to extort FASB, as well as exposing and laying bare on the table the inside baseball, hidden caches of alleged "assets" that are not really worth what is being claimed, and other forms of rooking the public while laying off the costs on taxpayers.

Sadly, I see no evidence that the FCIC will do any of this.  There is nothing in the hearings I’ve seen to date that suggests that Wachovia’s Steele, for example, nor The Fed, will be called to account on exactly where are those CDS, what are they worth, and why did The Fed and other regulators ignore their existence and lack of public valuation and disclosure?

Nor has the FCIC asked Henry Paulson (or Tim Geithner for that matter) why is it that the former 14:1 leverage limit was removed and why shouldn’t it be put back in force now, since it is now a known fact that had it been in place neither Lehman or Bear would have failed, and if it had applied to AIG they wouldn’t have failed either!

No, instead we have a circle jerk of monkeys, prancing before the cameras, but with no substantive progress and disclosure.

Phil Angelides is no Ferdinand Pecora.

More articles from the Market Ticker….

As campaign season heats up in my home state of Vermont, environmentally conscious voters have been remarking on the similarity between media ads on local TV by Entergy, owner of the radiation-leaking Vermont Yankee nuclear plant, and BP, responsible for the worst environmental catastrophe in American history.

Both Louisiana-based giants are trying to assure the public that the worst is past, that they are responsible corporate citizens cleaning up their respective messes, and the public has nothing to fear. But like the proverbial Pinocchio whose nose gets longer every lie, their respective PR teams have made their mutual cover-ups even more obvious.

Consider the homey testimonial of a Vermont Yankee manager telling Vermonters how much he loves living near the Connecticut River, which runs adjacent to the aging plant where elevated levels of radioactive tritium and strontium 90 have been found in monitoring wells, in the groundwater and now, in the river itself. “The river is my home,” says site manager Russ Rusinki on camera. “I like to fish on it. I like to eat fish out of this. I like watching my daughter follow in my footsteps on this river. I have absolutely no concerns about my family living near Vermont Yankee. It’s a healthy environment. It’s a safe environment.”

I’ve been sampling responses from Vermonters. They aren’t buying it.

Remarks Mary Gagnon, a video store owner in Hardwick, Vermont: “It is one thing to say ‘I LIKE to eat fish out of this.’ It is another to actually eat the fish. Let’s see him eating the fish on a regular basis. Then we can talk.”

Even if the fish were safe to eat, Vermonters cannot feel encouraged by the news released in May by radiochemists at the University of Waterloo in Canada that baby teeth of children living near the plant show Strontium-90 concentrations 62% greater than those in the general populations of Vermont and New Hampshire children. And this comes from samples taken during the last decade, before the reports in January 2010 of known radiation leaks.

You know the saying, “Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.” Most Vermonters are no longer fooled. They know that Entergy officials were caught lying to state officials, denying that Vermont Yankee had underground pipes leaking radionuclides when, in fact, the pipes were discovered in 2010 to be the source of not only the most recent leaks, but leaks going back to1998.

Perhaps this explains why, according to The Center for Disease Control, Vermont has the highest cancer incidence rate among the young of any US state from 1999-2004. Windham County, where Vermont Yankee is located, has the highest death rate from cancer between 1999 and 2005 of any Vermont county (741 deaths). Equally significant, from 1996-2005 there was a fivefold increase in thyroid cancer in Vermont women. The Vermont Department of Health acknowledged this particularly finding as being statistically significant” given that thyroid cancers are linked to “excess radiation exposure.”

News of the radiation leaks and Entergy’s lies dominated headlines in Vermont last February and convinced the Vermont Senate to vote against re-licensing the plant last spring. But the battle isn’t over yet. Entergy, mindful that the future of nuclear energy (like that of offshore oil drilling) hangs in the balance, will do everything possible to win back Vermonters’ trust. After all, it’s been 35 years since the Three Mile Island meltdown. The much vaunted “nuclear renaissance” under the Obama administration seems to be on hold until the Vermont Yankee issue is resolved. No wonder Entergy officials have vowed after losing the Senate vote that they would remain “determined to prove our case to the legislature, state officials and the Vermont public” that the plant is a “vital, safe and reliable source of clean power.”

BP, meanwhile, has its own shareholders worrying about rising legal costs and evidence of liability. Ever since it was able to cap the breach of its Deepwater Horizon rig, it has been putting out “all is well” signals through the media, with the federal government often acting as a willing partner. Thus, on August 9, the New York Times quoted government sources as saying “Three quarters of the oil from the Deepwater Horizon leak has already evaporated, dispersed, been captured or otherwise eliminated – and that much of the rest is so diluted that it does not seem to pose much additional risk of harm.”

But local fishermen and independent journalists disagreed. They reported that the 1.8 million gallons of highly toxic dispersant that made oil disappear is profoundly affecting the health of their fellow workers and families, turned the entire Gulf into an eery green color, and killed off far more wildlife than was being reported.

On August 23, even the Times had to reverse itself, challenging the government’s “rosy narrative” by citing a study by the University of Georgia saying the rate of evaporation and biological breakdown “had been greatly exaggerated.” The editorial also cited a report in Science magazine that a team of scientists had found an underground oil plume the size of Manhattan.

The government, the Times went on, “finds itself challenged” on another front, by its insistence on the safety of fish caught in the water. “Senior government officials announced flatly …that it is safe to eat fish and shrimp caught in the 78 percent of federal waters in the Gulf that are open to fishing – an assertion reinforced by photo-ops of President Obama eating seafood during a visit to the Gulf.”

Should we be reassured? The Times, having been hoodwinked previously, reserved some skepticism, noting that oil spill critic Rep. Ed Markey of Massachusetts thought that “seafood now available is risk free” but that the government had not been testing enough in “off limits areas where oil still exists.” Above all, the editorial concluded, the Obama administration’s “larger problem is one of credibility, which can only be fixed with much clearer answers about the spill.”

Meanwhile, clearer answers continue to pour in from around the Gulf, where local fishermen report finding shrimp coated with oil, and seeing crabs, stingrays, and dolphins desperately trying to escape the water, whose oxygen has been depleted by the use of chemical dispersants.

This brings me to the role of whistleblowers in defying the PR spin of both corporations. Thanks to EPA whistleblower Hugh Kaufman, we learn that “The sole purpose…for dispersants is to keep a cover up going for BP to try to hide the volumes of oil that has been released and save them hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars of fines.”

In Vermont, the heroes of the day are Arnie and Maggie Gunderson, whose Fairewinds consultancy firm succeeded in providing enough sound evidence of Vermont Yankee’s problems to break through industry lies and help convince the Vermont Senate to vote against re-licensing Vermont Yankee. Now the Gundersons are questioning the “credibility of the whole nuclear regulatory process in the state of Vermont,” providing evidence in a recent report to the legislature that the Department of Health and the Department of Public Service had been “actively communicating with Entergy in an attempt to discredit” the efforts of Fairewinds to analyze the plant.

The Gundersons have an important ally in this ongoing battle: Vermont Senate ProTem President Peter Shumlin, who helped shepherd the anti-relicensing vote in the Vermont Senate last spring and on August 24th emerged as the winner in a highly contested, five-way race in the Democratic Party primary for governor. Pending a recount requested by runner-up Doug Racine, who is also opposed to extending Vermont Yankee’s license beyond 2012, Shumlin will be facing down Republican gubernatorial candidate Mark Dubie, who supports Vermont Yankee.

As the battle lines are tightly drawn, Vermonters will be hearing from another candidate as well: this writer, who is running on the Progressive Party ticket for attorney general. I’ll be challenging the incumbent on his failure to deal with consumer fraud in Entergy’s advertising, and will strive for whistleblower protection in Vermont, which has the worst record in the country. It should be an interesting campaign with national ramifications. Stay tuned.

You can find out more about Charlotte’s campaign for Vermont attorney general at www.chardennett.org.

Journalist and attorney Charlotte Dennett is the author of The People v. Bush: One Lawyer’s Campaign to Bring the President to Justice and the National Grassroots Movement She Encounters Along the Way, published by Chelsea Green.

Read more….

By Michael Trinkle, ForexTraders

Yesterday’s Asian session saw a lot of activity and was generally dominated by sales, but the American market seems to have found some floor on somewhat positive confidence and home sales data. The market seems to be rowing against the currents, however, because the positive nature of the releases is only on the surface.

Among today’s news, neither the report about better than expected industrial production rates (0.3% vs. -0.4%)in Japan in August, nor data on growth of retail sales have done much to help Japanese stocks. Nikkei was down by more than 3 percent, and most Asian stock markets registered losses, even as currencies remain strong against the USD. In U.S. better than expected home sales data for June failed to make any impact since we already possess disastrous numbers for July.

Moody’s warns about Chinese banks

Apart from uncertainty caused by Japanese inaction,pessimism about Asia was boosted today on a report by Moody’s, via the Telegraph, about the unsustainability of the current lending practices in mainland China, where the government is risking future stability by supporting bank lending through debt (i.e. higher leverage).

“Moody’s said China Investment Corporation (CIC), the country’s sovereign wealth fund, borrowed $8bn last week to recapitalise three state-owned banks, using debt rather than genuine equity to boost bank capital.

The agency said that beefing up the banks by this method is “credit negative” for China as a whole: “The increases in assets and equity are artificial and without real economic substance. The increase in reported equity enables the banks to lend more and effectively leverages up the system.”

• Weird rumors about Zhou Xiao Quan defecting leads to early Asian sell-off

  Testimony to the degree of nervousness that exists in the markets about China right now, Asian session saw major a sell-off upon claims that the PBOC Head, Zhou XiaoQuan, who had not been visible for a while in the media, had defected fearing punishment for large losses of about $430 billion suffered in consequence of his team’s FX management strategies.

  China may be a strange place in many ways, but it is not North Korea. One has to look a long way back to the past, to the times of the Zhao Ziyang, for example, to find the kind of ostracism that might conceivably compel an official to leave the country. The fact that rumors like this can find credibility is nothing more than a sign of how skeptical many people have become about the multiple Chinese bubbles, but even with all the problems in the country, the head of the central bank defecting because he fears punishment is just too outlandish to be believed.

Israel says Iran may attack a Middle-East nation, Iran threatens to bomb Dimona

The problems between Iran and Israel are not new, but the intensity of rhetoric has been increasing for the past three months or so. In yet another step of escalation, an Iranian official is quoted as saying that the country will bomb Dimona Nuclear Reactor if it gets attacked, as Israeli minister Dan Meridor, in a question and answer session on Israeli radio in Farisi, expressed his fear that Iran would attack a Middle Eastern nation.

What he means is probably that the Iranians will respond to American bombing of their reactors by attacking Israel, which is, in his thinking, a third party not involved in hostilities. We suspect that this type of comment reflects the desire of Israelis to leave the military attack to the US due to their frontline status, and the greater risks they would face in the face of an Iranian counterattack. That also speaks against a unilateral, pre-emptive Israeli attack on Iranian installations.

It is of course difficult to reach conclusions on the basis of isolated statements such as these, but given the importance of the Gulf Area in maintaining global economic stability, traders must keep an eye on the region even if matters appear to progress (almost) smoothly at the moment.

CFTC withdraws reform proposals, leaving retail forex clients free to (almost) suicide at 100:1 leverage

The CFTC had made some sensible and suitable proposals for reforming the FX market a while ago, but those proposals appear to have been withdrawn in the face intense opposition from lawyers, dealers, and some speculators. The most crucial piece of contention is maximum leverage, naturally, since it is a major cause of the frequently large losses suffered by traders, and the huge profits reaped by brokers.

The CFTC had proposed a regulation capping leverage at 10:1, at just one tenth of the currently available level at 100:1 in the U.S. At the moment, in the EU and the UK even higher leverage is possible, which explains why so many brokers prefer to base their operations in European or British centers. The calculation is simple,:while returns for the trader are often disappointing, the broker makes ten times as much money from the spread at 100:1 leverage than he would at 10:1.

Among other things, according to the statement at the CFTC website, the new, diluted rules will require “the registration of counterparties offering retail foreign currency contracts as either futures commission merchants (FCMs) or retail foreign exchange dealers (RFEDs), a new category of registrant. Persons who solicit orders, exercise discretionary trading authority or operate pools with respect to retail forex also will be required to register, either as introducing brokers, commodity trading advisors, commodity pool operators (as appropriate) or as associated persons of such entities. “Otherwise regulated” entities, such as United States financial institutions and SEC-registered brokers or dealers, remain able to serve as counterparties in such transactions under the oversight of their primary regulators.“

In other words, the CFTC is aiming to streamline regulation, and end the chaotic state of the retail forex market by establishing straightforward regulatory categories.

Also,

“FCMs and RFEDs are required to maintain net capital of $20 million plus 5 percent of the amount, if any, by which liabilities to retail forex customers exceed $10 million. Leverage in retail forex customer accounts will be subject to a security deposit requirement to be set by the National Futures Association within limits provided by the Commission. All retail forex counterparties and intermediaries will be required to distribute forex-specific risk disclosure statements to customers and comply with comprehensive recordkeeping and reporting requirements. “

On the whole, pretty much of a disappointment, after we have seen how miserable the consequences of letting an industry regulate itself are in the subprime crisis. The CFTC is letting the NFA determine leverage limits, which means that the brokerage business will get away with whatever limit (or lack of it) serves its interests best.

In sum, we note gold’s powerful rally today, and, in agreement with others, anticipate the breaking of new records in the coming weeks. In other respects, we continue to expect a significant deterioration in global economic stability largely as a consequence of major upheaval in China and the rest of the Asian region. We believe that this phase of the economic downturn lasting since 2007 will reach its climax in Asia, and Europe in the next two years.

More articles from ForexTraders….

By Karl Denninger, The Market Ticker

Yes, let’s divert attention from the real issue, as politicians and their hacks are known to do:

This campaign strategy won’t stop huge Democratic losses in a year when the economy is the dominant issue, but it surely will reinforce Republican fears that the deficit commission is nothing but a political trap. Mr. Obama wants the GOP to support entitlement reforms in exchange for tax increases, but when they do he’ll pocket the revenue and slam the GOP for the entitlement "cuts."

If you read the rest of the article, you’ll find not one peep about where the real problem lies.

Oh, don’t get me wrong.  Social Security is huge mess, not the least of which was caused by administrations on both sides of the aisle post-Grace Commission literally stealing the tax revenue and spending it, but at the same time refusing to consolidate the liability on the government balance sheet.

Only in government is such a thing legal.  In the private sector games such as this lead to "instant indictment (and lawsuits) – just add lawyer."

But in the government sector keeping two sets of books isn’t only not a criminal act, it’s how government does business.  And while it’s bad in the Social Security arena, the real problem is with Medicare – a program that The Right – that is, George W Bush – radically expanded.

See, Social Security will run out of (alleged) bonds to redeem in 2039, or whatever it is this year.  Those bonds, of course, aren’t really bonds – if they were you could sell them anywhere.  But you can’t sell them anyone but Treasury, and Treasury has no money.  So to "redeem" or "sell" those bonds Treasury is going to have to issue some new ones in exactly equal amount into the public market, and who knows what the rate of interest will be that will be demanded on those.

(ed: Of course government could promote a stock market crash to scare everyone into government bonds when necessary, or even worse, do things that might tread awfully close to the line of confiscating private retirement accounts and forcing them into Treasuries.  Oh wait – we have seen that before and have heard rumors of it in the future, haven’t we?  Keep your eyes open on this one – it’s coming.)

But while Social Security will formally go "into the red" within a few years on a continual basis, and thus be an immediate and permanent contributor to formal budget deficits (as opposed to off-balance-sheet ones, where it has been operating now for a couple of decades) the real mess is coming in Medicare – which is being intentionally ignored.

Simply put, there’s no way we can fund what was promised with Medicare.  We can manage to find ways to do it with Social Security – the simplest is not to remove the cap on tax payments, as doing so would cause the indexing to move up (negating much of the benefit.)  No, the simplest is to raise the retirement age.  While Social Security is simply a tax and entitlement (that is, a welfare benefit) on a legal basis, if you try to get rid of it Granny will likely reach for her shotgun.  It is the "don’t let them do that" meme that the Democrats have used for last 20 years to instead hide the truth – that is, bluntly, to lie about how Social Security is (or in this case is not) funded.

But Medicare is an insoluble problem.  We simply cannot, as a matter of public policy, give every older person who needs one a new hip.  Nor can we afford hundreds of thousands of dollars per-person for treatment of obesity-related diseases (primarily cancer and diabetes and their complications) and other similar maladies – some of which are products of old age, but many of which are products of lifestyle choices.

The simple fact of the matter is that we have to have a very public debate over exactly what sort of medical backstop you’re entitled to from our society, with the facts and figures laid out.  This must become immediately self-funding, and that debate then has to result in tax and spending policy, with hard enforcement created by an absolute bar on cost-shifting and budgetary games as are currently played by Congress.  That is, Medicare has to be entirely isolated and self-funded – with no outside Congressional support – and no ability to either raid the funds or supplant them.

We either do this or within the next 20 years it will blow up in our face as the Boomers both retire and become sicker.  Trying to "bend the curve" by limiting reimbursements to doctors won’t do it.  The simple fact of the matter is that we are technologically capable of doing things in the medical trade that we cannot pay for when it comes to providing them to everyone.  We can either ration by price or ration by scarcity, but we cannot avoid rationing of these expensive medical treatments and remedies.

I prefer to ration by price but my preference in this regard is "soft."  What I find unacceptable is the incessant lying by our government, and others including medical practitioners, in the making of the claim that we can avoid the rationing entirely.

That simply can’t happen.

The average person earns $2.25 million in his or her lifetime – before taxes.  One man in two will get cancer in his lifetime, one in three women.  Many of those cancers are easily-treated and reasonably-inexpensive, but a whole lot of them are not – they’re insanely expensive whether you survive the disease or not.  Other chronic conditions are similarly expensive.

It is, in fact, quite easy to run up a medical bill that exceeds the entire earnings potential of the average American during his or her lifetime.  Note that this is before tax and actual living expenses, so this is in fact a bill that is at least three times, and likely four or five times, actual disposable income.

We can’t cover that folks. 

This is not about compassion, it is about math.

We have (once again) written checks with our mouths that we cannot cash with our hands and minds, and yet we refuse to talk about it and have a frank discussion as Americans about where the line truly has to be – and what we will accept as Americans in order to move it from where it is now – the impossible – to where it will wind up.

Yes, I know this is the "Third Rail" of American Politics – even more so than Social Security.

But whether we want to step on it or not, that light you see in the distance is, in fact, a train.

More articles from the Market Ticker….